There are a number of business tax provisions that expired after December 31, 2011 (commonly referred to as “extenders”), which will impact companies both in terms of their 2012 interim tax provision calculations as well as their 2012 quarterly estimatedtax payments. Two of these are international provisions which may require some in-depth analysis to determine the impactof their expiration. True Partners Consulting can assist you with this analysis.
To read the full article click here.
Michigan’s Department of Treasury announced in December 2011 that it will be offering companies that have not previously reported unclaimed property, or which have underreported unclaimed property in the past, an opportunity to voluntarily get into compliance with the State’s unclaimed property reporting requirements through a new Voluntary Disclosure Program (“Program”). Under the terms of the Program, Michigan will agree to waive all penalties, as well as applicable interest, on unclaimed property reported and remitted to the State by companies participating in the Program. In order to take advantage of this opportunity, companies must enroll in the Program by completing and submitting the Michigan Unclaimed Property Voluntary Disclosure Agreement (Form 4869) by the January 31, 2012 due date. Once a company has enrolled, it must complete the filing of the report for the current year and the previous four years by July 1, 2012.
To read the full article click here
On December 23, 2011, the Government released long-awaited temporary and proposed regulations to clarify the difficult distinctions between currently deductible business repairs and capital improvements. These regulations replace prior proposed regulations issued in 2006 and 2008…
To read the full article click here
As the national real estate market continues to struggle, property taxpayers need to position themselves for potential significant increases to their bills. Specifically, as residential property values continue to decline in many areas, there may be dramatic tax burden shifts to businesses to pay for the cost of local government. Taxpayers throughout the country need to be aware of changes to values within their areas, how their properties are valued relative to other properties in their areas, and the specific dates and deadlines for appealing valuation when appropriate. Failure to appeal could mean increases in future tax liabilities. In addition to taking action through pursuing property tax appeals, taxpayers also need to budget for the future and plan accordingly.
To download the full article click here
The Challenge
The world is constantly changing at such a speed that it often becomes overwhelming just to keep up. New technology is making it possible for us to conduct business transactions in ways we never dreamed would be possible. In order to adapt to the boom in sales and marketing on the internet, states have begun passing new legislation to keep their sales-tax revenue streams from drying up through enactment of so-called “Amazon laws.”
Click here to download the full PDF.
In today’s challenging economic environment, companies face difficult business choices. Should they expand by acquisition or by constructing new facilities, maintain the status quo, or downsize? No matter what strategy is employed, strategic decisions have immediate and future tax implications-especially with regard to personal and real property tax.
To download the full PDF, click here
On Monday, August 15, 2011, Illinois Governor Pat Quinn signed into law House Bill 1560, which shortens the dormancy period for “unclaimed wages, payroll, and salary, in any form” from five years to one year. The bill included language providing that the new legislation is effective immediately.
Click here to download full PDF
By Anne Szustek
August 9, 2011
The Ways and Means Committee, the tax-writing body in the US House of Representatives, debated whether to institute a nationwide consumption tax during a panel on July 26.
Even though questions surrounding the US debt ceiling have been set aside for the time being, the utility and feasibility of such a tax is still a point of deliberation.
The Fair Tax Act would get rid of federal income, payroll, estate and gift taxes in favour of a retail tax that would be applied equally across the 50 states. States would also be charged with collecting these taxes and paying them to the US Treasury.
The retail tax would not exactly be a VAT, but it would bear some similarities. Rather than taxing each stage of a given item’s production costs, it would simply be a blanket 23% sales tax. The Bill also includes a provision for a monthly rebate payment to US residents up to the poverty level. After 2015, a Sales Tax Bureau and Excise Tax Bureau would be established in lieu of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), with the former handling the new nationwide consumption tax and the latter administering any taxes that would have been under the auspices of the IRS.
This Bill repeatedly has been up before Congress. Should it pass before Congress adjourns in December it may take several years before anything would be instituted.
“There are a lot of challenges for [a nationwide consumption tax] to happen,” said Tracey Sellers, managing partner at True Partners’ Tampa office. “There’s a lot to be hammered out, in terms of government authorities understanding how it would be instituted, and special interest groups pursuing their cause.”
The Bill’s proposed timeline still might not offer relief soon enough, said Anthony Lacoudre, international tax director at accountancy firm WeiserMazars, who sees a VAT as an effective tool to combat the nation’s debt crisis.
“As far as the timeframe is concerned, many experts believe that the US will default in the course of 2012 or 2013, so the sooner a VAT is introduced, the better,” he said.
“As far as a tax increase is concerned, implementing a federal VAT in the near future looks quite plausible to me. Direct taxes in the US are already at a very high level, especially when compared to Europe and I don’t see too much room for substantial direct tax increases in the US,” he added.
“On the contrary, the US does not tax consumption as highly as they do in Europe, which means that there is clearly some room for indirect tax increases in the US.”
Unlike in Europe, individual states in the US each have their own sales tax, which they would likely be loath to adjust. For example, Florida has no personal income tax and relies on general state sales taxes for 70% of the state’s income.
Given that Canada and the US have similar structures in terms of provincial- and state-level taxation, the US’ neighbour to the north was suggested as a potential model for a nationwide consumption-based tax, should the US decide to pursue it.
________________________________________________________________________________________
For more information, contact Tracey Sellers
Tracey.Sellers@TPCtax.com
(813) 434-4004
The following provides a few of the causes of incorrect deferred tax assets:
The Challenge
Has anyone asked you that question lately considering that the U.S. and global economy has suffered through what experts are calling the “Great Recession?” In 2010, we saw some improvements in our economy, but some experts believe that there is still some risk of a “doubledip” recession. Whether there is risk that we’ll dive into another recession or that our economy is back on the growth path, one constant has remained, which is all companies are still going to pay real property taxes. All 50 states in the U.S tax real property and the assessors who value your real estate are inconsistent in ensuring your property reflects the various definitions of “market value” for each state. In an uncertain environment such as the one we are living, the question becomes, “Is the
The insurance industry was shaken in recent weeks by California’s settlement with John Hancock Financial Service Inc. over the company’s non-compliance with the State’s unclaimed property laws. We believe that California’s willingness to re-examine an industry with a history of strong compliance with the unclaimed property laws may signal a renewed focus by all states on unclaimed property as a valuable source of revenue resulting in tougher scrutiny of all companies. Consequently, we strongly encourage all corporations to review their unclaimed property compliance function immediately.
Money on the Table?
The current economy’s “new normal” has forced companies to reassess their operations and look for untapped opportunities to continue lean, profitable practices. Many companies leave money on the table by failing to negotiate tax and business incentives with state and local governments. Negotiated Incentives increase companies’ return on investment by offsetting initial costs and lessening tax liability.
A License of Software Used to Operate Switch Hardware Was Found to be Exempt From Sales Tax as a Technology Transfer Agreement, and Possible Refund Opportunities Exist
The California Court of Appeal in Nortel Networks, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization, No B213415, (Cal. Ct. App. , Jan 18, 2011), recently held that certain software sales were not subject to California sales and use tax because they were considered a technology transfer agreement (TTA).
Summary
Recent Georgia property tax changes provide additional notice and appeal opportunities to Georgia taxpayers this year while property values are at historic lows.
Calendar year sellers and issuers of gift cards should immediately review their accounting to determine whether they should change their method of accounting to get the benefit of new, taxpayer-friendly rules. True Partners can help with the analysis and filings.
The Challenge
As we preparers enter the heart of our filing season gathering fixed asset data, preparing extensions, filing renditions, and reviewing assessment notices, the main question at hand is “Have we done everything in our power to ensure our personal property tax liability is as low as possible?”
A Culture of Advancement
The world around us is advancing at a rapid pace when it comes to technology. Does anone still have an old Blackberry smartphone? Or do you now use an iPad tablet PC? They are everywhere because of what they offer, the efficiency they bring, and all of the “apps” that an individual user can incorporate to improve their lives.
Please find attached TPC’s slides and documents for our June 9, 2011 seminar on Interim Reporting – Income Tax Compliance Issues. Our workshop provided hot topics and industry trends on forecasting, modeling annual estimated ETR, discrete events, completing form UTP and tax law changes impacting 2010 tax returns.
Download Detailed Checklist PDF
Download Interim Reporting PDF
Download Multistate Tax Update PDF
Download Uncertain Tax Position PDF
Accounting for windfall stock compensation –“ with-and-without” or “tax-law- ordering” election.
Overview
The New Year ushers in a new incentive program in the state of New York. As many states continue to struggle with high unemployment, they are looking for incentives to spur capital investment and job growth. In 2011, businesses in certain targeted industries can apply to participate in New York’s Excelsior Jobs Program. Targeted industries include agriculture, back office, distribution, financial services, manufacturing, scientific research and development, software development, and other significant projects. Businesses are accepted into the Excelsior program based on new job creation or significant capital investment and may qualify for the following tax credits:
Multinational Companies (MNC’s) face increasing pressure from various tax authorities to ensure they pay their correct taxes, particularly now when governments attempt to fill their tax coffers whilst businesses face commercial pressures and incur significant losses. By Les Secular, Partner True Partners Consulting (UK) LLP.
On December 17, 2010, President Obama signed “The Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010” (the “2010 Tax Act”). While most of the 2010 Tax Act provisions are directed towards individuals and estates, there are a few important provisions for business as well.
BY DANIEL FALK
The term ‘‘transfer pricing’’ has not exactly been household jargon in the United States since the U.S. Treasury Department issued updated final regulations under Section 482 of the Internal Revenue Code in 1994.
Certainly before that, one would have been hardpressed to find anyone outside the tax world who understood what the term referred to. But recently transfer pricing has appeared in articles that were published by several mainstream online business portals, such as Bloomberg, and these stories were then picked up by even more recognizable media sources, such as ABC News and Business Week magazine.
Normally such references would be regarded as positive—after all there is no such thing as bad publicity—to tax practitioners. However, the recent stories have not only misrepresented what the term transfer pricing refers to, but essentially implicate all multinational firms that engage in transfer pricing as being complicit in ‘‘nefarious’’ or ‘‘evil’’ tax avoidance schemes.
FAS 109 Income Tax Accounting for Mergers and Acquisitions
- M & A Deal Aspects and Integration
- Transaction Costs: Sections 338 and 382
- Accounting For Business Combinations
- International and Domestic Tax Updates
- Year End Planning
- AND MORE…
OVERVIEW
On September 27, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, which, despite its name, contains important tax provisions affecting businesses of all sizes, as well as individuals. The overall purpose of the Act is to stimulate investment by providing tax incentives and revenue‐increasing loan opportunities.
OVERVIEW
In line with the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act, Alabama, Georgia and Florida have implemented state incentives aimed at creating new jobs for the unemployed.
WHAT TYPES OF BENEFITS ARE AVAILABLE?
Alabama—Up to 50% income tax deduction on eligible employee wages
Florida—Corporate tax credit of $1,000 per eligible employee
Georgia—Tax credits for up to four calendar quarters per eligible hire
In October 2008, California Governor Schwarzenegger signed tax legislation that had revenue raisers, as well as incentives designed to stimulate the California business climate, such as a single sales factor election, a two-year net operating loss carryback, a 20-year net operating loss carryforward, andthe assignment of credits between members of the same combined reporting group. Most of these provisions were to take effect for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2011.
The credit assignment provision allows affiliated corporations that are members of the same combined group to assign credits to each other beginning July 1, 2008. The assigned credits can be utilized against tax by the assignee beginning on or after January 1, 2010.
OVERVIEW
Is it possible to pay more tax and, as a result, generate additonal book income in the process? The answer is a resounding YES! Today, Illinois’ Tax Amnesty program went into effect and will run through November 8, 2010. The program is designed to raise much needed cash for the financially distressed state. As a result, the rules of eligibility are largely focused on cash generation. Under the program, the Department of Revenue will abate all interest and penalties due from any taxpayer owing any tax to the state for taxable periods ending after June 30, 2002 but prior to July 1, 2009. Amnesty does not appy to motor fuel tax or franchise tax. Also excluded from the program are liabilities currently subject to civil litigation. However, taxpayers can withdraw the litigation and participate in the amnesty program on the amount at issue.
Overview
Is your property tax function effective? How do you know? A client once told us that his property tax function was effective because “the attorney handling our appeals said so.” Ever since that meeting, we have pondered the question, “How do you know?”
On November 6, 2009, Congress passed legislation allowing taxpayers to elect a greater carry back period for net operating losses (“NOLs”) generated in tax years 2008 or 2009. The original carry back period of two years was extended to allow taxpayers to recover taxes paid three, four or five years prior to the year of loss.
Overview
Have you ever tried to walk down an up escalator? Clearly a tempting challenge as a young child, but how about as a full grown adult? In many ways, property taxes in Illinois are like an up escalator. No matter what is happening in the world around us, the Assessor finds a way to increase the assessed value of all property and this, as a result, increases your real estate tax bill. Less than 2% of Illinois property owners actually appeal the value, thus attempt to walk down the up escalator. Are you one of the few? If not, would you like to embark on a journey to walk down the up escalator?
As many states are grappling with the recession and a gloomy economic outlook, state legislatures are attempting to find inventive ways to stimulate the local economy. This newsletter describes significant tax legislation passed, pending, proposed, or failed during the 2010 legislative sessions in the various states in the Southeast. The failed legislation is important due to the economic position of many states. Although certain legislation may have failed initially, it is a signal of the types of legislation that may pass in a special session or in subsequent years. The following legislative synopsis contains either direct or indirect excerpts from legislative committees or specific bill language. In addition, this newsletter is current as of the date prepared as stated above and is not intended to be a comprehensive analysis of the respective legislative sessions.
Since the Quality Stores decision, the IRS has been quick to deny protective refund claims filed outside of the 6th Circuit for FICA taxes dealing with severance related supplemental unemployment compensation benefits paid in the 2006 tax year. These protective refund claims were filed in response to a Michigan District Court holding that certain involuntary severance payments were not subject to FICA taxes, United States v. Quality Stores, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15825 W.D. Mich. Feb. 23, 2010.
In addition to denying Quality Stores claims filed by employers outside the Sixth Circuit, the IRS is also examining claims filed in the Sixth Circuit more closely.
OVERVIEW
As part of the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act, states are implementing their
own subsidized employment opportunities. Each state has slightly different
requirements and benefits, but all of the programs are aimed at increasing the
number of jobs available to Americans.
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
5:30 – 8 p.m.
Join alumni, recent graduates, students, parents, and colleagues for a night of networking in the tallest building west of Chicago, Library Tower.
Reconnect with Pepperdine friends or establish new business contacts while enjoying conversations, breathtaking views, complimentary appetizers, and wine.
There is no charge to attend, but advanced registration is encouraged.
Location:
Library Tower
True Partners Consulting LLC
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 6200
Los Angeles, CA 90071
If you are a Pepperdine University Alumni and would like to register for this event Click Here
Allea Newbold teams up with other professionals to provide continuing education to Florida accountants
This May, Managing Director Allea Newbold will be participating in a two-day, continuing professional education seminar in Fort Lauderdale, Florida the week of May 24th. This TEI event, hosted at the Westin Fort Lauderdale, will cover topics ranging from Payroll & Benefit issues to State Income Tax and Legislation. Presenters include representatives from True Partners Consulting, the Big 4, Grant Thornton, and others. Mrs. Newbold will be lecturing on the issues arising from FIN-48 and the new proposed Schedule UTP, Uncertain Tax Position Statement. Allea specializes in ASC 740-10 (FIN-48) issues as well as other areas that include accounting methods and ASC 740 (FAS 109).
Managing Director extends help with educating other CPAs on recent tax issues
This summer, Tampa Managing Director, Allea Newbold, will be teaming up with KBKG, Inc. to present a course on the recent developments related to repair and maintenance expenses.
This course, which qualifies each participant for one hour of CPE credit, focuses on the opportunities to expense these repair and maintenance costs currently instead of capitalizing them. As a result of companies following the financial statement treatment of these expenses, and they are often overcapitalizing these costs.
Mrs. Newbold will help cover the fundamentals of the repair and maintenance tax issues, while also hitting on the most important aspects of maximizing the benefits provided in this area. The course will also cover proposed regulations relating to these repair and maintenance issues. The lecture will include information that is vital to the tax reporting of these items. There will be updates on how to file an accounting method change for the 2009 tax year (for returns not yet filed), so companies can benefit currently from the repair and maintenance expenses.
This course will be held three times over the summer as a free CPE webinar. It is scheduled for June 4, July 9, and August 10.
For more information on this event please Click Here
Overview
Poison pills, also commonly referred to as Shareholder Rights plans, were first
introduced in the early 1980s, in an environment of hostile takeovers. As a
defense against hostile bidders and leveraged buyouts, target companies would
implement poison pill plans to deter acquisitions by competitors and corporate
raiders. Rights plans achieved this by distributing rights to purchase additional
shares to the non‐offensive shareholders at a discount, effectively diluting the
hostile investor’s ownership percentage. These purchase rights would be
distributed once a triggering event had occurred, typically when an unwanted
investor had acquired a 15% to 20% ownership stake.
2009 will likely go down as one of the worst financial slumps in history. The economic
downturn has resulted in companies realizing losses at every level of their supply chains.
This in turn has far‐reaching implications on the transfer pricing methods applied by many
taxpayers. At the same time, tax authorities, facing increased pressure to collect additional
tax revenues, will look to impose transfer pricing adjustments.
Most taxpayers have adopted a profit‐based approach in setting their “arm’s‐length”
transfer pricing policies. During normal economic times, such an approach allows taxpayers
with mature businesses to earn acceptable profits in the tax jurisdictions in which they
operate. During an economic downturn, however, a multinational enterprise (“MNE”) may
incur significant losses and the same transfer pricing policies may cause distortions in the
operating results of individual entities. Such distortions include “limited risk” distributors
with significant losses, or contract manufacturers not able to cover fixed costs.
The changing composition of state and local tax warrants more attention. As the
economy constricted in 2009, state and local tax receipts declined from 9.25% of
Gross Domestic Product in 2008 to 8.8% in 2009. According to the U.S. Government
Accountability Offices (GAO) report to Congress on State and Local Governments’
Fiscal Outlook (GAO-10-358, FY 2009), while most sources of state and local tax
receipts decreased, property tax receipts increased. In 2009, corporate state income
tax accounted for approximately 10% of all state and local tax receipts while property
tax accounted for more than a third of all state and local receipts totaling
approximately 34%.
Is Your Tax Team Tactical or Strategic?
Do You Proactively Promote Legislative Change?
The tax world of today is more complex than the tax world of yesterday, or is it?
Aided by technology and prompted by tough economic times, governments have
become more aggressive in audit and collection activities.1 Regardless of
economic conditions, tax matters present complex challenges which require a
careful analysis of laws, regulations, judicial decisions, administrative decisions,
customs, and practice. In addition to complex legal analysis, tax issues require a
firm understanding of the facts. Closer scrutiny and heightened regulation of
accounting for income taxes have increased the job requirement complexity for
tax professionals. Ironically, companies have recently reduced resources
allocated to the tax function as part of an overall business contraction.2 By
necessity, corporate tax teams generally adopt a tactical approach, largely
ignoring the strategic potential of proactively promoting legislative change.
Highlights
Under the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 signed into law by President Obama on November 6, 2009, taxpayers may elect to carry back net operating losses arising in a 2008 or 2009 tax year for up to 5 years. A similar election was created for certain small business taxpayers as part of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 but was only available to a limited number of taxpayers.
Now, any business (with limited exceptions) regardless of its size qualifies for an extended carryback period of 5 years. The new legislation applies to net operating losses of a taxpayer for any taxable year ending after December 31, 2007, and beginning before January 1, 2010. The carryback election, however, may be made only with respect to one taxable year within such period.
On February 23, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan held in the Quality Stores case that the taxpayer was entitled to a $1 million refund in overpaid FICA taxes on severance payments. This decision should cause employers to reconsider whether protective FICA refund claims related to severance payments should be filed. The deadline to file FICA refund claims for 2006 severance payments is April 15, 2010.
The Energy Tax Incentives Act of 2005 added Section 179D to the Internal RevenueCode, which allows a deduction for “energy‐efficient commercial building property” is placed in service. If you own, lease, design, or build energy efficient commercial buildings, you may be entitled to a federal income tax deduction for the cost of energy‐efficient property.
Section 179D caps this deduction at $1.80 per square foot. For example, a 250,000 square foot building may result in a potential deduction of $450,000 for qualifying energy‐efficient property. To qualify for the deduction, several criteria must be satisfied, including an energy savings threshold requirement. Partial deductions are available for buildings not meeting the overall energy savings building requirement.
There is a timely opportunity for companies to deduct previously capitalized repair and maintenance costs for a reduction of a taxpayer’s current tax liability or increase their net operating loss (NOL) to be carried back five years for federal income tax purposes. Due to an upcoming change in the regulations, companies may be significantly limited in the ability to deduct previously capitalized repair costs.
Many companies follow the book method of accounting for repairs and maintenance expenses and often times overcapitalize certain types of repair costs. Such costs maybe currently deductible for federal income tax purposes in the year in which they were incurred. Companies may be eligible to file an automatic accounting method change for the 2009 tax year and currently deduct the remaining basis of such improperly capitalized repair costs thereby resulting in accelerating cash flow. Many industries are impacted including retail, real estate, manufacturing, services, and energy. Typical capitalized repair costs include roofs, HVAC, parking, painting, and renovations.
Companies should consider filing the automatic accounting method change prior to the finalization of the Treasury Regulations for tangible property. True Partners Consulting can assist estimating the potential amount of overcapitalized repair costs for tax purposes.
OVERVIEW
True Partners’ Cap 2 Xpense team analyzes your company’s 2009 capital expenditures budget in order to maximize expiring taxincentives that the legislature has currently set to sunset by December 31, 2009.
THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW
By carefully planning your remaining 2009 capital expenditure budget, you can recoup significant costs and maximize expiring tax benefits, including:
• Increased IRC §179 expense deduction (up to $250K)
• 50% bonus depreciation
• Accelerated placed-in service
• Refundable tax credits
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times,” so starts Dickens’ timeless masterpiece, A Tale of Two Cities. For many C-Class executives, the current recession has certainly been the worst of times, at least in their business careers. However, as companies take a hard look at their current operating structures, both legally and functionally, it is the best of times to achieve not only operational efficiencies but also tax efficiencies. This article discusses and illustrates, through a case study, some of the tax benefits that can be achieved through restructurings for a corporation conducting business in more than one tax jurisdiction.
Download full PDF
As the calendar year of corporate America enters into the fourth quarter with more financial uncertainty on the horizon, there is one thing which is known for sure: The financial world in which we all live and hopefully prosper provides a much more transparent view into the financial health of a company’s operations. To many of you this evolution may have seemed to take an eternity; the long hours, increased professional fees, and scrutiny over every minute detail associated with your corporate governance, internal controls, and financial reporting have been flowcharted, documented, and memorialized in volumes of text. To others this may be just the beginning, and you may soon feel much like Alice as she embarks on her incredible journey on the other side of the looking glass. No matter which side of the mirror you are on, transparency will certainly be the overriding theme.
Download full PDF.
Employers who provide cell phones or other similar telecommunications equipment to employees must comply with IRS record-keeping requirements or risk losing their Tax deduction. The IRS requires taxpayers to support its tax deduction relating to employer-provided cell phones with written records inteming the amount of the use and expense, each time and place of such usage, and the business purpose of each expense or use.
On October 13, 2009, the Wall Street Journal published an article concerning President Obamaí’s international tax reform proposals. The article, Obama Administration Shelves Plan to Change How U.S. Treats Overseas Profits, stated that President Obamaí’s international reform proposals have been postponed for 2009. However, many tax practitioners believe that the Obama administration will reconsider some form of these proposals in 2010.